Nomination
k6ka (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)
The user JustinLovesWikia12345 has requested that k6ka be nominated for Bureaucrat. The user believes that k6ka would make a fine bureaucrat due to the dedication that he has for the wiki. This belief is also shared in part on my side as well: he has indeed made frequent edits in the wiki, and is one of the most active members of the wiki, frequently taking part in communications, handling users, etc. MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES (user talk:Mathetesalexandrou) 20:18, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Note: the user that requested this nomination has been blocked from editing The Sims Wiki. Therefore, I am inclined to say that this nomination is null-and-void. However, Mathetesalexandrou has indicated support for the nomination as well. So, as a result, I will be closing this nomination unless Mathetesalexandrou wishes to "adopt" it. If he would like to do so, then we can proceed along as usual, and K6ka can either accept or decline the nomination being made by Mathetesalexandrou. -- LostInRiverview talk • blog • contribs 22:27, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Adoption seems like a good thing. I proceed to take the nomination over. MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES (user talk:Mathetesalexandrou) 22:36, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- This nomination has been adopted by a user in good standing and is valid. It now awaits a response from the nominee. -- LostInRiverview talk • blog • contribs 22:41, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Well... I suppose if a response is necessary, I would like to humbly accept this nomination. Thank you Mathetesalexandrou for nominating me! --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 22:44, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- This nomination has been adopted by a user in good standing and is valid. It now awaits a response from the nominee. -- LostInRiverview talk • blog • contribs 22:41, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Adoption seems like a good thing. I proceed to take the nomination over. MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES (user talk:Mathetesalexandrou) 22:36, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
Discussion
Please include your comments below. This discussion shall last at least five days. Time remaining until the minimum deadline has elapsed: .
Given my choice to adopt the nomination and the rationales given above, I don't really need to further explain my position, do I? MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES (user talk:Mathetesalexandrou) 23:10, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: There's literally no way I can possibly include all of K6ka's positive traits in one comment. He is an expert at how wikis work and a stellar administrator. He is very active in community discussions, projects and other endeavors. He is kind, friendly, approachable, helpful, and assumes good faith in users. K6ka is completely qualified for this promotion and he has earned it. -- LostInRiverview talk • blog • contribs 23:41, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: K6ka is certainly qualified for this promotion and he has most certainly earned it. He is definitely expert at how the wikis work. There's literally nothing else I can say, since everyone else seems to have said it for me. -- C.Syde (talk | contribs) 23:45, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: K6ka is a combination of highly dedicated to this wiki, being well versed on the workings of wikis in general and in addition is experienced with wiki administration, both here and elsewhere. In addition, the somewhat dwindling activity of the other bureaucrats means that I feel like we could probably do with another one as well. If you put that together with what has already been said I see no downside to this nomination and I can only see the wiki being better off as a result. Best of luck with your nomination! ―ฬђ talk 00:42, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: K6ka is certainly qualified for this promotion and he has most certainly earned it. He is definitely expert at how the wikis work. There's literally nothing else I can say, since everyone else seems to have said it for me. -- C.Syde (talk | contribs) 23:45, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: All I can say is that this request is a no-brainer. I was wondering when the day would come that K6ka would request or be nominated to be a 'crate. I see no reason why he shouldn't be and all the reason why he should be (which have been mentioned over). -- Icemandeaf (talk) 01:35, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support (wholeheartedly): I definitely support K6ka's nomination for bureaucrat status. I believe that the powers of a bureaucrat would only improve this dedicated member's ability to help the wiki develop into one even better than it already is and to protect the community and the wiki's content from those who wish to do it harm. Therefore, like Icemandeaf, I think it's a no-brainer: K6ka certainly should become a bureaucrat. Good luck, K6ka! ―The Tim Man (Infinite Histories • Galactic Crucibles • The Sims Wiki • Hallows Maleficent • Why I'm here in the first place) 03:29, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - I fully trust k6ka to become a bureaucrat. He's very active, friendly to other users, great in editing and organizing the wiki, always participates in discussions... you name it all. I have no doubt k6ka is one of the best editors in this wiki. It takes no time to consider whether he should be a crat or not! Nikel Talk – Vote! 05:26, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - k6ka seems like a good person in real life and most of their edits (i know he's a dude, but i would pronounce k6ka as "Keka" and i see it as a girl's name.) seem constructive, like fixing "formation" and spelling error's. - Kaiko. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaiko Mikkusu (talk • contribs) 07:50, February 1, 2015 (UTC) (UTC) - Please sign your comments with ~~~~
- Support: K6ka is a very good guy/girl. He/she is very active and friendly. I support the nomination. --AStranger195 —Preceding undated comment added 10:40, February 1, 2015 (UTC) (UTC) - Please sign your comments with ~~~~
- Support: Well, most of my reasons had been told. K6ka is a great editor. He already has high positions from Wikipedia and Wikia that he had join. Not only that he's a great editor but he's also a helpful and good person. I highly doubt that he wouldn't get this position. ThePeculiarMe (talk to me) (my mistakes) 11:27, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: K6ka is a very good guy/girl. He/she is very active and friendly. I support the nomination. --AStranger195 —Preceding undated comment added 10:40, February 1, 2015 (UTC) (UTC) - Please sign your comments with ~~~~
- Support - k6ka seems like a good person in real life and most of their edits (i know he's a dude, but i would pronounce k6ka as "Keka" and i see it as a girl's name.) seem constructive, like fixing "formation" and spelling error's. - Kaiko. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaiko Mikkusu (talk • contribs) 07:50, February 1, 2015 (UTC) (UTC) - Please sign your comments with ~~~~
- Support - I fully trust k6ka to become a bureaucrat. He's very active, friendly to other users, great in editing and organizing the wiki, always participates in discussions... you name it all. I have no doubt k6ka is one of the best editors in this wiki. It takes no time to consider whether he should be a crat or not! Nikel Talk – Vote! 05:26, February 1, 2015 (UTC)