FANDOM


Trait TS4 Bookworm
Archived page
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

NominationEdit

Beds Beds (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)

Hi, I'm Beds. A fair while back, I was an administrator and bureaucrat here on The Sims Wiki, but due to personal reasons, I retired my rights and took a step back from the wiki. I've been back for a few months now and I have decided I would like to, once more, receive administration rights.

The reason I have requested for rights, is due to the low number of admins, and wish to help get the wiki's activity back up to it's heavy activity it used to have. I always said that, if need be, I would come back as an administrator to help the running of things around here. As for my wiki editing skills, I say I am quite skilled. I know how to make a template, whatever use it is needed for, I have a little bit of knowledge in HTML coding. On top of all of that, I know of the Wiki rules and know how to edit a page, how to license an image, and I can be quite fair at times.

It should also be noted that I am doing this solely for the Wiki. Wiki activity has been low lately, with only a few users editing and mainly IPs making messes of articles, it is collecting dust and dust can be quite bothersome at times.. The dust has to be removed and the community can help with that. It should also be noted that I will not abuse the rights, if given to me.

Thank you for considering my request. Beds (talk - blog) 21:33, August 14, 2014 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

Please leave any discussion comments or questions below. This period of discussion will last for at least five days. Time is expired


Strong support You abdicated your sysop flag in good standing, and you've remained in good standing since. I am very confident that you could use the tools of adminship again, and without issues. Welcome back to the administrative team, Beds! --k6ka (talk | contribs) 22:22, August 14, 2014 (UTC)

You did an excellent job as admin and bureaucrat last time, and I see no reason why you won't do at least as equally well this time. Not to mention, between your retirement and this point you've remained active and engaged in the wiki. Strong support - LostInRiverview talk ~ blog 22:23, August 14, 2014 (UTC)
Strong support - I have no doubt that you'll do at least as well as you did before. Dharden (talk) 22:27, August 14, 2014 (UTC)
Strong support I may not have known you before when you were an admin and bureaucrat, but I also have no doubt that you will make a good admin now. Icemandeaf (talk) 22:30, August 14, 2014 (UTC)
Strong support - I must confess that I was rather reluctant about supporting your RfA - I would have preferred to vote for / against someone who'd never been an admin before.
But a few of our admins haven't contributed anything in months and we really need more admins. The last time I checked, there was no official limit to the number of admins we can have on this wiki. I'd be happy to take a step forward myself, but in the mean time I'm more than happy to support your nomination! :) -- C.Syde (talk | contribs) 05:15, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
Support - I see no reason why you shouldn't be given the rights again considering you did a fine job last time, I have full confidence you'll do well again. ђ talk 07:09, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
Strong Support - I definitely support this request, as Hana was a super competent and helpful admin/bureaucrat last time (not that she isn't anymore!) and I'm sure the wiki will really benefit from her becoming an admin, especially at this time. ~ Waikikamukow (Anyone wanna chat?) 08:08, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
Support - I do not have much to say. I trust you, and if I have to say something about it, it's pretty much like others have said. Nikel Talk Vote! 11:02, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
Strong support - I honestly don't have much to say, but you've done so much to the wiki when you first became an admin. I'm pretty sure you can do it again! EpicJoyBoy (My talk page!) 23:00, August 15, 2014 (UTC)


──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Strong Support Very competent and helpful. Ѧüя◎ґ (talk) 02:03, August 16, 2014 (UTC)

ConclusionEdit

Based on unanimous support, Beds has been promoted. -- LostInRiverview talk ~ blog 00:39, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.