← Pages for Deletion | ← Past deletion discussions
Page(s) for deletion: Peeping NPC's
This page is about a mod for TS4 that is very explicit and does not belong on TSW. We have no pages for SFW mods such as ACR, so why does WW deserve a detailed page? I don't think this page is appropriate for TSW because it is NSFW and it details features for a mod, which is not what TSW is about. I’m K.P.! Toss me a message if you need help! 15:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly. It definitely shouldn't be on here at all. I don't know how that page was allowed to be on here in the first place. IDontKnowAName3 (talk) 15:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- I fully agree. it's a shameless breakage of the T for Teen rating that the Sims franchise upholds. The fact it has been open for so many years is wild. WizardJeremy (talk) 16:27, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Delete, but not because it's outside our scope. We have articles on AwesomeMod, Overwatch, and InTeenimater, so we do include custom content if it's notable. However, our coverage on custom content—even for notable mods—is rarely in depth, generally broader in scope and limited to one page on the subject. Most of what is described in the article is already described in WickedWhims § Added Sims. Some wording tweaks may be needed to remove things like "appropriately named" and "rightfully named"—we're here to document, not tell the player what they should think—but I do not think that we need a separate article to describe an NPC introduced by a mod; everything can be described adequately in WickedWhims and there is no need to go in depth about these NPCs. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don’t think mods deserve more than one page, simply because we’re not a CC wiki. Nothing wrong with the awesome mod or main Wicked Whims page, I just think multiple pages is too in depth for what we are. I think I was just straight up wrong on my first post, either that or poor wording, but the point still stands, this doesn’t belong here. I’m K.P.! Toss me a message if you need help! 18:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Delete for the reasons already stated by K6ka, K.P. and Wizard Jeremy. nancyandthetabithas (talk) 19:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see why we need to have an article for a feature included within a mod when to my knowledge no other mod has more than one single page of content on the wiki. I would support deletion. Consensus seems strongly in favor of deletion however I will not delete just yet in case any stragglers have a convincing argument in favor of keeping this article. ―ฬђ talk 08:02, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- This mod seems largely inappropriate so I will support deletion (if it has not been deleted already). RedWizard98 (talk) 01:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Consensus was reached supporting deletion, therefore the page has been deleted. Before I deleted the article I read over it and I am of the of the opinion that what isn't listed on the mod's page already is too in depth so I didn't transfer any of it over. ―ฬђ talk 08:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)