The Sims Wiki

Welcome to The Sims Wiki! Don't like the ads? Then create an account! Users with accounts will only see ads on the Main Page and have more options than anonymous users.

READ MORE

The Sims Wiki
The Sims Wiki
(→‎Active Restrictions: This works better for linking and such...)
No edit summary
(17 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{shortcut|TSW:ER}}This page lists specific rules put into place for existing users by [[The Sims Wiki:Administrators|Administrators]]. These users have likely been troublesome in one way or another yet seem to want to contribute [[The Sims Wiki:Assume good faith|in good faith]] or don't warrant any kind of extremity when it comes to discipline and as such, are given specific additional restrictions based on past behavior, tendencies to act disruptively, etc.
{{Info|Trial|This feature is currently undergoing a trial and may or may not become fully adopted. Please see [http://sims.wikia.com/wiki/The_Sims_Wiki_talk:Admin_Portal#Editing_Restrictions this discussion] for further details.}}
 
{{minibox|start}}
 
{{minibox|shortcut|TSW:ER}}
 
{{minibox|end}}
 
 
This page lists specific rules put into place for existing users by [[The Sims Wiki:Administrators|Administrators]]. These users have likely been troublesome in one way or another yet seem to want to contribute [[The Sims Wiki:Assume good faith|in good faith]] or don't warrant any kind of extremity when it comes to discipline and as such, are given specific additional restrictions based on past behavior, tendencies to act disruptively, etc.
 
   
 
The rules here are to be dealt with by Admins only. If you see one of the following users causing trouble in one of the listed manners, please inform an admin ASAP.
 
The rules here are to be dealt with by Admins only. If you see one of the following users causing trouble in one of the listed manners, please inform an admin ASAP.
Line 12: Line 7:
 
<!-- EXAMPLE RESTRICTION FORMAT
 
<!-- EXAMPLE RESTRICTION FORMAT
   
=== {{userlinks|Example}} ===
+
=== User name ===
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
  +
||'''User:'''||{{Userlinks|Username goes here}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
||'''Instated by:'''||Admin name goes here
 
||'''Instated by:'''||Admin name goes here
Line 24: Line 20:
 
|}
 
|}
 
-->
 
-->
=== {{userlinks|Mrs.red bird}} ===
+
=== DrakonoSkerdikas ===
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
  +
||'''User:'''||{{Userlinks|DrakonoSkerdikas}}
 
|-
 
|-
||'''Instated by:'''||{{LabSig}}
+
||'''Instated by:'''|| [[User:K6ka|K6ka]] on 21:26, September 6, 2019 (UTC)
 
|-
 
|-
  +
||'''Overview of Problems'''|| Drakono has had quite a bit of history over the past year, including [//sims.wikia.com/index.php?title=Fun&action=history&year=2019&month=3&tagfilter= counterproductive edit warring] and [//sims.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DrakonoSkerdikas&oldid=887435#Use_the_preview_button failing to use the preview button]. They've also been extremely unresponsive and unwilling to act on or even notice messages left on their talk page, as evidenced [//sims.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DrakonoSkerdikas&oldid=887435#RE:_Revision here] where their edit duplicated an entire article, and despite the fact that I left them a message on their talk page, they somehow insisted I [[Special:Diff/875307|didn't leave them a response]]. They have also demonstrated a lack of patience and rational judgement in their actions, as evidenced by a frivolous [[Special:Diff/882130|page move]] done without consensus or without heed to [[The Sims Wiki:Spoilers|standard practice]], as well as forum threads making irrational proposals such as [[Forum:*Says something unpopular and controversial:*|shutting down fanon creation because "I don't think I can word out my reason properly"]]. Most notably, however, their edits have been of exceedingly low quality, often filled with typos and poor grammar, making it very hard for copyeditors to correct his work. Recently they were left a [//sims.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DrakonoSkerdikas&oldid=887435#Issues_with_your_grammar message] informing them of their low quality edits, citing these as examples ([https://i.imgur.com/xxwiTcO.png] [https://i.imgur.com/ZkbppXp.png] [https://i.imgur.com/F5SwC8k.png] [https://i.imgur.com/Cwjh05r.png] [https://i.imgur.com/tZ8c8EH.png] [https://i.imgur.com/sRFuhKc.png] [https://i.imgur.com/zqfTrwS.png] [https://i.imgur.com/A7fScpV.png] [https://i.imgur.com/OEyeTyx.png]). They responded with [https://i.imgur.com/p4hbihF.png this], as well as [[Special:Diff/887434|this]], and then made [[Special:Diff/887665|this]] edit on [[Telephone]], with the glaring errors highlighted [https://i.imgur.com/LR1jUcq.png here].
||'''Overview of Problems'''||Since registering, Mrs.red bird has garnered a reputation for creating misleading blogs and using the comments system to spam and this has also boiled over to fanon. It seems she is banned from several other wikis for disruption but given she's had a few good faith edits here, it's worth trying to keep her around.
 
 
|-
 
|-
||'''User Restrictions'''||
+
||'''User Restrictions'''||
  +
* DrakonoSkerdikas is '''prohibited''' from making edits on his own to articles and game guides. This prohibition does not extend to pages outside of those two namespaces. It also does not apply if the edits are clearly uncontroversial in nature and would not require checking, such as the reversion of vandalism.
*Writing multiple comments on blogs/fanon articles which have no particular purpose will result in a 24 hour ban with all comments on said article to be deleted. Subsequent offences will stack.
 
  +
* DrakonoSkerdikas is '''required''' to either 1) draft his changes and propose them on the talk page for review; or 2) explain his changes on the talk page in a "please change X to Y" format. Users reviewing his changes should have some establishment on the wiki; there is no hard requirement, but a new user with few or no other edits is not permitted to review changes by DrakonoSkerdikas. Preferably, the user reviewing the edit should be proficient in English and willing to suggest changes to DrakonoSkerdikas for further revision before publishing their changes. Changes published into articles should be free of glaring spelling or grammatical errors.
*Creating purposeless or misleading blogs will also result in a 24 hour ban with subsequent offences stacking. Any blogs which fall under this are to be deleted.
 
  +
Any breaches to these restrictions will be met with a [[Project:Blocking|block]]. In edge cases, a warning may be issued instead. These blocks shall escalate in length for repeated offenses.
 
|-
 
|-
  +
||'''Comments'''|| Refer to [[The Sims Wiki talk:Admin Portal#Editing_restriction_on_DrakonoSkerdikas]]. Due to the nature of this situation, this ER should only be moved into probation once the user has demonstrated an improvement in their English writing capabilities and have been more open to discussion and criticism on their talk page.
||'''Comments'''||She knew via my talk page that she would end up here if she carried on and once again she tried her luck. This will come into effect once her current 3 day block is up. {{LabSig}} 21:49, May 2, 2013 (UTC)
 
|}
 
 
=== {{userlinks|Lesya Zirka}} ===
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|-
 
||'''Instated by:'''||{{LabSig}}
 
|-
 
||'''Overview of Problems'''||Lesya Zirka has been known for a little while to have a major interest in Ukrainian culture. While this is certainly not a bad thing, it has caused numerous issues in moderation which had caused a role in her two chatbans for spam and a number of her blogs being deleted due to their content, as they were merely just a few lines about one specific thing regarding Ukrainian culture ([http://sims.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Undelete?target=User+blog%3ALesya+Zirka%2FDarya+Domracheva&timestamp=20130312194056 example] - admins only, sorry) and they have caused a backlash from members of the community.
 
 
With her chatbans and previous other warnings (both on-Chat and on-wiki) taken into account, it seems something should be done to make this not so much of an issue for both [[The Sims Wiki:Chat|Chat]] and the wiki in its entirety. Lesya has potential as evident by her edit count and it would be fair to try and keep her around despite all of this.
 
|-
 
||'''User Restrictions'''||
 
*Lesya is allowed to post one line of text about Ukrainian culture in [[The Sims Wiki:Chat|Chat]] and can continue a discussion provided ''others also share an interest in the discussion''. If after one line there is no response, she should leave it be. If she continues then she'll earn a 24 hour ban from Chat for each offence and subsequent offences will stack (example: 24 hours > 48 hours > 72 hours etc.). This also includes complaining that nobody is responding to her on the subject.
 
*Lesya must not create blogs with very little content about one thing related to Ukranian culture. Doing so will result in her related blogs being deleted and a block of 24 hours will be applied for each offence with subsequent offences stacking.
 
*As it hasn't been a major issue, Lesya is allowed to mention her interests in Ukranian culture in the [[Forum:Off-topic discussions|off-topic forum]] provided ''she has something substantial to add'' or a small reference (like in [[Forum:The person below you game]]). Abusing this in relation to her aforementioned blogging restriction will result in the same blocking model as mentioned above.
 
|-
 
||'''Comments'''||
 
*Note that an offence in Chat should not equal an additional ban on-wiki unless both Chat and the wiki have been used for these offences and vice versa. If she can go about a month or so without any offences then I'll move this to probation. I'm counting on you Lesya, don't mess this up. {{LabSig}} 19:04, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
 
*Was just notified on IRC that Russian and Belarusian have been a bit problematic too. Basically if it's sparse in nature and appeal then it probably should be considered under this. {{LabSig}} 19:38, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|}
 
|}
   
 
==Probation==
 
==Probation==
 
Users listed here have shown good behavior and are to be released from their restrictions pending an additional 30 days of good behavior. Users must be reasonably active during these 30 days in order for their restrictions to be lifted.
 
Users listed here have shown good behavior and are to be released from their restrictions pending an additional 30 days of good behavior. Users must be reasonably active during these 30 days in order for their restrictions to be lifted.
 
 
[[Category:Site administration|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 
[[Category:The Sims Wiki|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 

Revision as of 21:26, 6 September 2019

Shortcut
TSW:ER

This page lists specific rules put into place for existing users by Administrators. These users have likely been troublesome in one way or another yet seem to want to contribute in good faith or don't warrant any kind of extremity when it comes to discipline and as such, are given specific additional restrictions based on past behavior, tendencies to act disruptively, etc.

The rules here are to be dealt with by Admins only. If you see one of the following users causing trouble in one of the listed manners, please inform an admin ASAP.

Active Restrictions

Below is a list of active restrictions on problem users. Users may be moved to Probation if they show good behavior for a reasonable amount of time since the institution of their restrictions or last block.

DrakonoSkerdikas

User: DrakonoSkerdikas (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)
Instated by: K6ka on 21:26, September 6, 2019 (UTC)
Overview of Problems Drakono has had quite a bit of history over the past year, including counterproductive edit warring and failing to use the preview button. They've also been extremely unresponsive and unwilling to act on or even notice messages left on their talk page, as evidenced here where their edit duplicated an entire article, and despite the fact that I left them a message on their talk page, they somehow insisted I didn't leave them a response. They have also demonstrated a lack of patience and rational judgement in their actions, as evidenced by a frivolous page move done without consensus or without heed to standard practice, as well as forum threads making irrational proposals such as shutting down fanon creation because "I don't think I can word out my reason properly". Most notably, however, their edits have been of exceedingly low quality, often filled with typos and poor grammar, making it very hard for copyeditors to correct his work. Recently they were left a message informing them of their low quality edits, citing these as examples ([1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]). They responded with this, as well as this, and then made this edit on Telephone, with the glaring errors highlighted here.
User Restrictions
  • DrakonoSkerdikas is prohibited from making edits on his own to articles and game guides. This prohibition does not extend to pages outside of those two namespaces. It also does not apply if the edits are clearly uncontroversial in nature and would not require checking, such as the reversion of vandalism.
  • DrakonoSkerdikas is required to either 1) draft his changes and propose them on the talk page for review; or 2) explain his changes on the talk page in a "please change X to Y" format. Users reviewing his changes should have some establishment on the wiki; there is no hard requirement, but a new user with few or no other edits is not permitted to review changes by DrakonoSkerdikas. Preferably, the user reviewing the edit should be proficient in English and willing to suggest changes to DrakonoSkerdikas for further revision before publishing their changes. Changes published into articles should be free of glaring spelling or grammatical errors.

Any breaches to these restrictions will be met with a block. In edge cases, a warning may be issued instead. These blocks shall escalate in length for repeated offenses.

Comments Refer to The Sims Wiki talk:Admin Portal#Editing_restriction_on_DrakonoSkerdikas. Due to the nature of this situation, this ER should only be moved into probation once the user has demonstrated an improvement in their English writing capabilities and have been more open to discussion and criticism on their talk page.

Probation

Users listed here have shown good behavior and are to be released from their restrictions pending an additional 30 days of good behavior. Users must be reasonably active during these 30 days in order for their restrictions to be lifted.