User talk:Aster09

Hi, welcome to The Sims Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Bella Goth page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- A morris (Talk) 15:19, March 21, 2009

New French Sims Wiki
Congratulations on starting your own wiki! You can use Interlanguage links to link from and to pages here. --a_morris (talk) 14:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Sims 3
Snooty Sims Forum :) For example:

The Goth Family: http://www.snootysims.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=29510

The Bachelor Family: http://www.snootysims.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=29507

--Aster09 11:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks :D Aster09 12:53, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Lolita Goth
From Snooty Sims :D

Link: http://www.snootysims.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=573912#p573912

Aster09 13:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Roomies
Hey! Do you have a Screenshot of Chris Roomies in the Sims 3? :)

Hi! Chris and Melissa are not in The Sims 3 :) Sorry... Aster09 15:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

If NON of the families that where on the original Sunset Valley page exist... then who came up with such complex characters...?

Langeraks
Who the hell is Dustin Langerak? And why do you think that Donyelle and Charles don't exist? The sims 3 people wrote about them.I mean how the hell do you know whats gonna happen in the sims 3?

Dustin Langerak is Kaylynn's father.

I know it because some people has the game, and they gives us informations and pictures (snooty sims forum).

There is no Charles Langerak or Zavarez Family.

You can see all the families in the sims 3 here: Sunset Valley.

Aster09 19:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

You mean people that have leaked version?

Maybe... Aster09 19:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Well. 1.Thats not the complete version 2. How do you know they didn't just make those families themselves and claim them as families in sims 3?

And in the final version Dustin Langerak become Charles Langerak?

So... everybody on Snooty Sims is lying? They are many to have the game...

"The sims 3 people wrote about them"? I want a link. :)

Aster09 20:00, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I don't have a link but once the game was in development these family pages came up. So the sims 3 people must have done them as you wouldn't expect a normal person to know what families would be in the sims 3 b4 it's release :)

The first toddler in the stealing candy from a baby video has been confirmed to be Daniel Pleasant. How can this be if the Pleasant family are not even in the game?! TomDuke 21:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed? Really? ahah! Link? -_- Aster09 21:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Lol well not exactly. But at the end of the day... he's GINGER?! Do you need any other confirmation lol? TomDuke 21:42, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

'''PFFFT! Not to be rude; well actually.. but you are incredibly annoying. How can you know for sure that none on these Sims will be on the FINAL game? Having some of your friends on Snootysims own the illegal copy does not make it at all FACT! Alot of people have obviously spent alot of time entering in these Sims traits and such; and it is completely unfair you dismiss all of this information when you have no idea?! The information should be kept until June 3rd. Then you have the right to do as you please!! TomDuke 21:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah! TomDuke right. And i'm the one whos been telling you that Simis is dead! Because that sims 3 people conformed that so if you don't know if is conforn I won't edit!

And, I found proof that the leaked version is not correct! 1) In this 'oh-so factual' leaked version, Malcom Landgraab III's father is called Geoffrey. Then who the hell is Malcom Landgraab II? All Landgraabs are named after eachother - why would Maxis suddenly change this?

And 2) Agnes Crumplebottom's husband is called Eric Darling in this leaked version. Mrs Crumplebottom's husband has been mentioned in the past - if I remember rightly, a park was named after him in The Sims. And, forgive me if I'm wrong, he was called Robert? Maxis are always pretty much spot on with their facts - they wouldn't make such a mistake surely?

methinks, you are wrong. TomDuke 22:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Lol, and to make my point even clearer, an EA rep has said that the torrent "is a buggy, re-final build of the game … Half the world -- an entire city -- is missing from the pirated copy."

http://www.destructoid.com/captain-obvious-pirates-heart-the-sims-3-in-a-big-way-133752.phtml TomDuke 23:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Go TomDuke! You Rock! OJV

If you want... we will see...

But you are so naive!

EA said that was a beta to prevent illegal downloading!

It is high time to end all the lies that is in this Wiki.

I prefer trust players on Snnoty to evil anonymous.

Aster09 08:55, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

It is not about not trusting people on Snootysims. It's about understanding that the leaked version is not complete. And that you can not use this as definite evidence certain sims are not in Sims 3. As said earlier, an EA guy has said it is half of the final Sunset Valley. You have no right to go around deleting a load of data some people have obviously spent alot of time typing up; until you know for certain. It's not about naivity, it's about using your brain. TomDuke 10:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

The leaked version can be not complete but with the complete families...

But it's EA who said that it was a uncomplete version. So maybe they said that to prevent illegal download.

Yeah, some people spend a lot of time creating rumors and lies.

How could they know so many things while the game was not released?

Today the game is available (illegally), so we have real informations!

End of discussion for me.

Done and think what you want.

Oh! and for: "Half the world -- an entire city -- is missing from the pirated copy." They are talking about Riverview i Think. Because with a illegal version, you can't download the neiborhood (and you can't download on the store).

END

Aster09 10:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

That is what you think. Hardly good evidence is it? The illegal version has said to be incomplete- and until the complete version reaches our shelves, no-one can be certain. YES, you might be right, but until June 5th nobody can be certain, even you're little law-breaking friends at Snootysims. Nobody with half a brain would take an illegal, incomplete version as set in stone! TomDuke

Yes, nobody can be certain. But, at least, we know that these informations are from the game The Sims 3 (even if it may be incomplete) and not from the imagination of an anonymous, like with the Zavarez Family.

The Zavarez Family appeared nowhere and has never been confirmed!

So at the risk being mistaken, I prefer to put informations of a game that can be incomplete than keeping informations from an anonymous.

Aster09 10:39, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Why not put a little not on the bottom of their page? Saying something like; This person is not in the incomplete version of the game; so it is unknown whether they will be in the final copy. Why would you feel it right to go around deleting everything? AND, why on earth would Maxis create Kaylynn Langerak as a playable character; but then have no Daniel? There would no point in her being there without him! But yes, I know that is just my opinion, but I sincerely doubt that Maxis would miss out so many of the great and key families from Sims 1 and 2. TomDuke 10:48, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

"I sincerely doubt that Maxis would miss out so many of the great and key families from Sims 1 and 2"

-> But for the story and the logic they have to!

For example: The Newbies, they are new in The Sims, so they can't live in Sunset Valley 25 years before... Same thing for the Pleasant Family: Jeff Pleasant "Jeff and his family are new to the neighborhood.". They are new in the town, so they can't live in this town 25 years before.

Maybe they will appear in Riverview like the Lothario Family...

It's just my opinion too, but i think that EA will not add any family in the final version (if this final version really exist!).

Aster09 10:55, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

That doesn't make sense. Of course there's going to be a final version - they're not going to release an incomplete bugged version into the stores are they? Sims 3 has already proven not to be factually correct - as Kaylynn is older than Mortimer, when in Sims 2 she is alot younger. So I doubt that Maxis would miss out the Pleasants, just to keep true to a bio in The Sims. Here's a deal, if they are not in the game, I will apologise and admit I'm wrong. But if they are, you need to redo all the deletions you've made and set up all their images, traits and such which you so hastily removed. TomDuke 11:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

In The Sims 2 Kaylynn SEEMS to be younger, but it's just because she's a NPC so she doesn't age!

I'm certain that EA will keep the story. And like I said, maybe they will introduice the Pleasant Family in Riverview. But I'm sure they will not be in Sunset Valley.

I accept the deal. If I'm wrong, I will apologise and I will correct my mistakes.

Aster09 11:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Well, that's sorted then. But back to the Kaylynn point, by Sims 3, she would be an elder. Maxis could of quite easily made her an elder NPC. That's my point, Maxis are more concerned of the story, about what their audience will want; and less bothered about being factually correct. Mark my words, there's going to be a whingly little ginger boy with the name of Daniel residing in Sunset Valley :) TomDuke 11:29, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Reminder (difficulty levels)
Landgraab: 3

Langerak: 4

Bunch: 5

Alto: 3

Wolff: 2

Wainwright: 2

Jolina: 1

Single Moms: 4

Wan-Goddard: 2

Keaton: 2

Crumplebottom; 1

Ursine: 1

Frio: 2

Working Friends: 3

Kennedy; 1

Koffi: 1

Roomies: 4

Alvi: 3

Bachelor: 3

Clavell: 2

Hart: 3

Sekemoto: 3

Andrews: 2

Steel: 1

Goth: 3