The Sims Wiki:Requests for administratorship/Fanon archive

FatimaSimovichHleb
i wish to stop vandals on the wiki and if i get adsop rites then ill do very well indeedFatimaSimovichHleb 18:16, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose - only 3 edits, with the first two being to this page and the other was to create a threatening userpage. GG   (t)  •  (c)  •  (b)  18:22, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * (threatening language removed)
 * (threatening language removed)


 * Request denied. Dharden (talk) 19:04, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

BobNewbie

 * Has grown into a part of the community, and has built the community.
 * Works hard at improving his grammar and spelling, and believes its substantial.
 * Has a anti-vandalism history.
 * Understands and has read all points given and needed creations for the Fanon Namespace, and has given his opinions and ideas.
 * Leveled, if not above, wiki-editing knowledge.
 * Experienced admin.
 * Gets along with almost everyone; tries to be friendly to all.
 * Will devote all his spare time to building the wiki in the Fanon category.
 * Is open to oppositions and support.
 * Helps and welcomes new users.

-- BobNewbie talk • blog 20:34, January 26, 2011 (UTC)#
 * Support.

- I have changed my vote to neutral because of what LostInRiverview had pointed out below. Other than that, I see no other issues. GG  (t)  •  (c)  •  (b)  20:38, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Full Support It's clear that he's made a wonderful job and he is going to continue it :). --Guilherme Guerreiro (talk here) 20:40, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Full Support I think he deserves it. There is no reason why; he is an idol. |_Andronikos Leventis Talk 20:42, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Full Support BobNewbie did a great job as Community Director, and we'll someone like him to help run the Fanon side! — Random Ranaun ( Talk to me! ) 21:27, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutral On the one hand, he did a good job as CD and was very active. On the other hand, he indicated multiple times that he would be leaving and he has not done so; how can we be sure that he won't get the position only to give it up in the future? --  LostInRiverview talk · blog 21:40, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

I took a while to decide, but I rather not request for now. I don't think i'm ready, and there are more people who could to the job better. -- BobNewbie talk • blog 07:01, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

GEORGIEGIBBONS
GG  (t)  •  (c)  •  (b)  20:54, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * I have admin rights on The Sims Medieval Wiki.
 * I have an anti-vandalism history in addition to rollback rights
 * I have fixed errors on various pages (such as grammar, spelling etc)
 * I like to help other users in whatever way I can.
 * I try to be friendly
 * I am always looking out for pages/files to be deleted whether it be vandalism, fanon etc
 * I understand the purpose of the Fanon namespace and I will contribute to the policies of the Fanon namespace.
 * I will accept any critisism given for whatever votes I may recieve.


 * Strong Full Support Whats there to oppose? Go GG! This wiki needs somebody like you to be an admin. BobNewbie talk •  blog 20:58, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Full Support GG definitely deserves becoming a Fanon admin. — Random Ranaun ( Talk to me! ) 21:27, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Support -  LostInRiverview talk · blog 01:07, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Support- He is a very skilled admin, we would only win with his promotion. Good luck. --Guilherme Guerreiro (talk here) 16:51, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree -- request approved. Dharden (talk) 18:56, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

DarthCookie
I know I can do this job, in case I don't get picked for Forum Mod.-- DarthCookie  Talk 11:09, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you do me a favor and list out your qualifications? An application for these positions should be longer than a simple sentence (look at past admin requests to see what I mean). --  LostInRiverview talk · blog 15:29, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me:


 * Over 1,300 edits
 * I try to improve the wiki as much as possible
 * I have excellent grammar
 * I'm a bureaucrat on 3 other wikis
 * I am active
 * Friendly and somewhat known by some members of the community

-- DarthCookie  Talk 18:37, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

- Support -  LostInRiverview talk · blog 16:59, January 30, 2011 (UTC)


 * - Strong Support --Guilherme Guerreiro (talk here) 19:17, January 31, 2011 (UTC)


 * - Support — Random Ranaun ( Talk to me! ) 19:21, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * - Support - ''' -- CookieMonster888 talk 22:47, February 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * - Support BobNewbie talk •  blog 12:55, February 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * - Support --Nacho 13:23, February 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Approved. Dharden (talk) 15:44, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Auror Andrachome
I claimed to have gone inactive for a few days, but, out of boredom with real life, I decided to come back. I see that being inactive does hurt you chances, as I read BobNewbie's request. I always pushed for the fanon wiki and Canon wiki to merge, and now that it is, I feel like I need to do this. I do have major experience with fanon wikis, such as Kingdom Hearts Kaizen, my fanon story over at Kingdom Hearts fanon wiki has received critical acclaim. Another story of mine, Strangetown, here we come, is a critical story I'd like to expand as well. On the Avatar Wiki, I have a story there as well, known as Avatar Forever. I've been on The Sims Wiki for nearly a year, and I know all the templates. I know what to do with fanon, and I'm capable of deleting alleged spam fanon (There's a difference between the two). Therefore, I request along with DarthCookie, BobNewbie, and Guilherme.
 * Just an FYI, saying you're leaving is different from saying you're taking a break. Even then, saying you're leaving multiple times is where the real issue lies, in my opinion. So I don't consider your saying you were leaving as hurting your chances. --  LostInRiverview talk · blog 00:48, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * , Strong Support. She has earned a lot of editing skills, she has helped the wiki, she has been an active member, thus making her filling all requirements to be an admin, good luck. --Guilherme Guerreiro (talk here) 17:44, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Support --  LostInRiverview talk · blog 17:00, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Support -- CookieMonster888 talk 19:25, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * While you have done a good job on the wiki, I have a few concerns about Auror's behaviour. While she has improved her behaviour, her most recent block was December 23rd for edit warring, which has frequently occured with Auror. Also, I have noticed that she went inactive and then returned to post this request and hasn't edited since, which can make us think that Auror may get the rights and leave. Other than that, everything is ok. GG   (t)  •  (c)  •  (b)  17:52, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep in mind that the Inactive Admin policy would also apply to these administrators, so it's not an issue where they would be permanently in place in a position, as if we were promoting people to Bureaucrat status. --  LostInRiverview talk · blog 18:00, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * You have made good progress in this wiki, but something about your behaviour should be concerned before taking this position. I know, the last time you spoke to me was just criticizing my admin experience, but I feel it's not a good way to say that I'm not trustworthy. Well, who knows? I think you should be more careful when trying to reveal your argument to someone. Walker guy94  [  Talk  ] 07:56, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * About my block in December: I was foolish. I made a mistake, which could have been easily avoided, but, it wasn't, and I truly feel ashamed of that. I really wished it didn't happen. This user had posted pictures on a player stories page, in which, some of them were a bit gory, and they were taking up space. After Dharden had a talk with the user, I decided it was okay to remove them. This led to my block. That certain user, despite having set up a page about that certain story and adding the gory images there, continued to add the images, and I removed them. After this happened, that user was given a warning, and I received a week block by an admin. That, was truly devastating. I wasn't mad at the admin who blocked me, but, I was mad at myself for doing something I knew I shouldn't have done. I knew that after that user undid my edit, I should've directed the commentary to an admin, but I'm stubborn, and continued the Edit War. It was my fault, and I still feel foolish about the block. I haven't been editing The Sims Wiki, just because I fell out of boredom. The wiki has grown considerably since I've been here, and I'm proud of all the users that made it's current shape. I am now returning to full activity, and my break is fully over. About what Walkerguy94 said: I'm actually surprised her returned to the wiki. I'm glad he has his own views on this whole thing. It helps to learn what I need to learn, and how I can improve. That was actually another reason I went inactive. I felt foolish, thinking I could be someone like LostinRiverview, or even a_morris. Could those kind of things happen? I don't know.
 * Support -- 01:17, February 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * A few months ago, I disagreed with Auror on basis of how she behaved. She was what I thought rude and stubborn. Yes, those are very bad traits for an admin to have. But don't we all have mistakes? I made a mistake and started a fight with her, which was wrong of me too. Auror continues to fall into positions where she seems to edit war, but the way I see it, she is just a little but stubborn and wants to improve those pages. I am supporting her because IMHO, she has the potential to do a great job. But I ask her to do one thing; to use a friendlier tone when approaching users. If she can promise the community that, I support her 100%. -- BobNewbie talk • blog 20:21, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Bob made an excellent point in my view, I would like to make his words my words too. --Guilherme Guerreiro (talk here) 20:30, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Support — Random Ranaun ( Talk to me! ) 20:44, February 6, 2011 (UTC)

Support -- DarthCookie  Talk 20:32, February 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Approved Dharden (talk) 16:13, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Thelamppost
Thelamppost I have been a regular contributor on this wiki for a while after joining nearly two years ago, and I would really like the chance to help with the new fanon space.--thelamppost 23:06, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * I am friendly and understanding
 * I have no standing disputes
 * I have made nearly 2'000 edits
 * My grammar is decent
 * I have a clean record
 * - Support. I will support your request, since we need a new Fanon admin what with GG's disappearance, and you seem to be a good and competent editor. But, please make sure to remain at least somewhat active in the future, especially now since the Fanon namespace, portal, categories, and templates are all being created. — Random Ranaun ( Talk to me! ) 04:59, February 20, 2011 (UTC)


 * - Support. I think you will do a good job, just make sure to stay active in the future.--  ♥DarthCookie♥  21:44, February 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * - Support. 1. I'm still here :P. 2. You have done some good work for the wiki and I think you'll do fine as a fanon admin. GG   (t)  •  (c)  •  (b)  22:41, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

Request Approved. Congrats. --  LostInRiverview talk · blog 05:38, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

chickkkkkennn dipppersss
i am nice and i want to be an admin because i have down syndrome and my dream would come true if i was an admin so please vote me in and ill make the wiki better chicken 14:16, April 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Request denied. You just came off a wiki block, you don't have nearly enough experience in wiki editing, you have not been a member of the community for nearly long enough, and you do not have rollback rights yet. --  LostInRiverview talk · blog 14:22, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

CrazyCrazy555
I would like to become an admin because...


 * I think i'm doing preety well with some of my fanon pages, the one i'm especially proud of is my page Fanon:Isabella Peters. Please check it out!
 * I have noticed quite a few fanon pages that are of bad quality, and I have not been able to delete it or warn about deletion.
 * Although I haven't been on the wiki for long I really do think i'm ready, so please tell me soon where-or not I can been an admin!

CrazyCrazy555 talk · blog 14:22, April 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose - no disrespect intended but a) you don't have rollback rights and b) you are still making basic errors with fanon, such as writing it in the wrong namespace. Also, to get rollback you may wish to edit in the mainspace, even if it is just fixing errors or something as it would help you. Now, I think it's too premature for you to become an admin but maybe in the future, I may support you. 20:08, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Request denied. Be sure to get rollback rights before you request an administrator or Fanon administrator position. --  LostInRiverview talk · blog 21:09, April 22, 2011 (UTC)

Woganhemlock
I would like to place a request to become a fanon admin. Some reasons why I believe that I could be a good admin include: I have read the administrator policies and would follow them. I hope this nomination is considered, as I believe with this right, I could be able to make more of a positive difference to the wiki community. --Wogan Hemlock  (Talk to meeee!!) 06:08, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * I get on to the wiki everyday
 * I try to be kind and considerate to all users
 * Even though I am new, I am somewhat known by the community
 * I have an anti-vandalism record
 * In the short time I have been here, I have more than 1000 edits, and around 1500 outright on all wikis
 * I have rollback rights
 * I have a clean record, I have not received a warning or block
 * Very Strong Support - I think you've done a marvelous job, and you do have skills for admin duties. I just feel you require a bit more experience as rollbacker, other than that I see no concerns and you'll use admin tools very well. Thank you. --Guilherme Guerreiro (talk here) 17:56, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Support - the amount of work that WH has done in a short amount of time makes him worthy of the rights. Plus, the sysop tools will help him with quite a bit of the stuff he usually does. Good luck! 18:00,April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Support -- CM888   Talk?  01:51, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Support - Wogan has done an amazing amount of work in the short time he has been here. He shows great skill in the edits he makes. He definitely deserves receiving sysop rights. —Random Ranaun (Talk to me! ) 06:50, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Support - Ѧüя◎ґ 21:03, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutral (leaning towards oppose) - I see that you have been doing a fine job here. My only problem is that you seem to be very new with all of the Wikia tools, not to mention about how new you are to the community itself. -- XoTulleMorXo  ( Talk  and  Contributions♥ ) 21:38, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Approved. Dharden (talk) 19:06, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

XoTulleMorXo
Seeing as how we are in need of fanon admins, I would like to apply to be one. I have some reasons on why I think I should be one. I believe the reasons are eligible enough to apply. What matters on this nomination is what the others think about it. -- XoTulleMorXo  ( Talk  and  Contributions♥ ) 23:45, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * I am highly active on wikis.
 * I have/had experience with being an administrator.
 * I am quick with reverting vandalism.
 * I am possibly known very well by different wikis.
 * I am a rollback.
 * I contribute daily here.
 * - weak support - You have been a valuable contributor to our wiki, but you have not yet done anything with our fanon namespace. Because of this, my vote is a weak support. Good luck. --Wogan Hemlock  (Talk to meeee!!) 00:10, May 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * - Neutral - While you are highly active and a rollback, I don't see you contribute much to the Wiki on the Fanon category. I've only actually seen you really edit there after requesting, to be honest. I'm also a bit hesitant because you haven't made any comments or additions to Fanon-related matters as of yet. No disrespect, but I would support it if you have showed more interest in working with Fanon articles. Zombie talk •  blog 13:34, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * - Support - --Guilherme Guerreiro (talk here) 19:17, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * - Oppose - I originally would have supported, but based on your recent IRC behavior, I am unsure if you deserve being a Fanon admin. —Random Ranaun (Talk to me! ) 20:05, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per Random Ranaun. Sorry. 20:11, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Support - Ѧüя◎ґ 21:05, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

I am approving this request. As far as I'm concerned, what's done is done. Wiki-wise, there is no reason why this request should not be approved. --  LostInRiverview talk · blog 06:23, May 13, 2011 (UTC)